Danes lahko sistemi, ki se s strojnim učenjem nenehno izboljšujejo, odločitve sprejemajo samodejno. Še vedno pa prevladuje mnenje, da tovrstni tehnologiji manjka človeški vidik in da ni dovolj prilagodljiva, da bi lahko zaznala vse posebnosti posameznih primerov. Po drugi strani pa avtomatizirani sistemi niso pristranski, zato lahko morda sprejemajo pravičnejše odločitve kot ljudje, če te odločitve temeljijo na ustreznih podatkih.

Ali lahko stroji sprejemajo pravičnejše odločitve? – slovenščina

The EU Temporary Protection Directive enables EU Member States to move rapidly to offer protection and rights to people in need of immediate protection and to avoid overwhelming national asylum systems in cases of mass arrivals of displaced persons. Although invoked several times in the past, the directive has never been activated before. Russia's military aggression prompted a unanimous decision in the Council to grant temporary protection (for an initial period of one year) to people fleeing the war in Ukraine. This temporary protection may be extended automatically by two six-monthly periods, for a maximum of another year. The EU's decision to grant temporary protection has been widely welcomed and the directive is considered the most appropriate instrument under the current exceptional circumstances. There are, however, still many open questions as to its practical implementation in the EU Member States.

EPRS policy podcast - Temporary protection directive

Automated decision-making by systems that use machine learning to dynamically improve performance are still seen as lacking the 'human perspective' and flexibility to adapt to the particular nuances of specific cases. But perhaps, as they lack the 'cunning' to hide their biases, automated systems actually make fairer decisions than do humans, when these decisions are based on data that have been properly curated.

EPRS STOA podcast - What if machines made fairer decisions than humans?

Morda se spomnite, koliko vam je v otroštvu pomenilo, če so vam odrasli prisluhnili. Unija skrbi za to, da se stališča in mnenja otrok upoštevajo.

Oglejmo si, kaj Evropa počne za otroke, ki sodelujejo pri sprejemanju odločitev o svojem življenju

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

Press Conference by rapporteurs Valérie HAYER, José Manuel FERNANDES on “the vote on the legislative opinion on the Own Resources Decision”

Press Conference Commissioner Marianne THYSSEN, on how to render decision-making in EU social policy more efficient

Press conference on Read-out of the College meeting and a more democratic and effective decision-making process on EU taxation policy

Sklep Komisije o tretjem svežnju o mobilnosti (razprava)

Commission decision adopted on the third Mobility Package (debate)

Sklep Komisije o svežnju za večletni finančni okvir po letu 2020 (razprava)

Commission decision adopted on the MFF post-2020 package (debate)

Odločitev ZDA o uvedbi carinski tarif za jeklo in aluminij (razprava)

US decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminium (debate)

Sklep Komisije o uporabi člena 7(1) PEU glede razmer na Poljskem (razprava)

Commission decision to activate Article 7 (1) TEU as regards the situation in Poland (debate)

Sprejeti sklep o strategiji širitve EU-Zahodni Balkan (razprava)

Decision adopted on the EU Enlargement Strategy - Western Balkans (debate)

Sprejeti sklep o svežnju o pravičnem obdavčevanju II in III (razprava)

Decision adopted on the Fair Taxation package II and III (debate)

Pristojnost, priznavanje in izvrševanje odločb v zakonskih sporih in sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo ter mednarodna ugrabitev otrok (razprava)

Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility, and international child abduction (debate)

Sklep o strategiji za plastiko (razprava)

Decision on the Strategy on Plastics (debate)

Sprejeti sklep o stanju energetske unije v letu 2017 (razprava)

Decision adopted on the State of Energy Union 2017 (debate)

Odločitev o začetku medinstitucionalnih pogajanj (člen 69c Poslovnika): gl. zapisnik

Decision on the opening of interinstitutional negotiations (Rule 69(c)): see Minutes

Sprejeti sklep o drugem svežnju o mobilnosti (razprava)

Decision adopted on the second Mobility Package (debate)

Odločitev predsednika Trumpa, da ZDA izstopijo iz sporazuma o podnebnih spremembah COP 21 (razprava)

President Trump's decision to withdraw the US from the COP 21 Climate agreement (debate)

Sprejeti sklep o svežnju o mobilnosti (razprava)

Decision adopted on Mobility package (debate)

Sklep, sprejet glede Evropskega stebra socialnih pravic, in pobuda za usklajevanje poklicnega in zasebnega življenja (razprava)

Decision adopted on the European Pillar of Social Rights and work-life balance initiative (debate)

Sprejeti sklep o svežnju evropskega semestra, vključno z raziskavo o letni rasti za leto 2017 (razprava)

Decision adopted on the European Semester package including Annual Growth Survey 2017 (debate)

EP Plenary session - Need for an urgent Council Decision in favour of amending the protection status of wolves in the Bern Convention

EP Plenary session - Commission statement- Norway's recent decision to advance seabed mining in the Arctic

EP Plenary session - Jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition of decisions and acceptance of authentic instruments in matters of parenthood and creation of a European Certificate of Parenthood

EP Plenary session - Draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament

AFCO extraordinary committee meeting - Vote on the European Council decision endorsing Parliament’s proposal to increase the number of seats by 11 ahead of the European elections in June 2024

EP Plenary session - The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession

EP Plenary session - Draft Council Decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Croatia

CULT Committee - Structured dialogue with youth- Mainstreaming youth participation in policy and decision making

EP Plenary session - US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights in the United States and the need to safeguard abortion rights and Women’s health including in the EU

EP Plenary Session - The proposed Council decision on provisional emergency measures for the external border with Belarus

Statement by Sergey LAGODINSKY, Chair of the EP-Turkey delegation on the decision of Turkish President to expel western ambassadors after the support to Osman Kavala

EP Conference of Presidents on the decision on laureate of the 2021 Sakharov Prize

Press conference : Democracy, Diversity, Dialogue and Decision for all

Meeting of the EP Conference of Presidents - decision on the Sakharov Prize 2020 winner

EP Plenary session - Women in decision making on company boards

EP Plenary session - Amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism

EP Plenary session- Draft Council decision on the system of own resources of the European Union

This infoclip is a part of the series of videos "How does the European Parliament work? (2019-2024)", illustrating the powers of the European Parliament by focusing on budgetary and co-decision procedures. The Parliament acts as a co-legislator, sharing with the Council, the power to adopt and amend legislative proposals and to decide on the EU budget. During the 2019 - 2024 parliamentary term, unexpected crises influenced the Union. In 2021, Parliament approved the Recovery and Resilience Facility, the biggest building block of the Next Generation EU recovery package designed to help EU countries tackle the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2024, the Parliament approved the first-ever revision of the EU's long-term budget, establishing predictable and stable financial support for Ukraine. This info clip illustrates how the EU budget is used and how the Parliament engages with other EU institutions.

How does the European Parliament work? (2019-2024) - Powers of the European Parliament: budget and co-decision procedures

On the occasion of her official visit to Czechia, EP President Roberta METSOLA participates in a debate with students at the Prague University of Economics and Business. This video shows extracts from the event ‘Making Decisions Together: What Europe do we want?’.

Official visit by Roberta METSOLA, EP President to Prague (Czech Republic): extracts from the debate ‘Making Decisions Together: What Europe do we want?’ at the Prague University of Economics and Business

MEPs vote on the following topics: Draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament - Lorant Vincze, Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors - SK nominee - Petri Sarvamaa; EU/USA agreement for scientific and technological cooperation: extension - Cristian-Silviu Buşoi; Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States - Dragoş Pîslaru; Taxation: administrative cooperation - Rasmus Andresen; Amendments to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure with a view to strengthening integrity, independence and accountability - Gabriele Bischoff; Single Market emergency instrument - Andreas Schwab; Ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe - Javi LÓPEZ; Sustainable aviation fuels (ReFuelEU Aviation Initiative) - José Ramón BAUZÁ DÍAZ; 2022 Report on Türkiye - Sánchez Amor; and Relations with Belarus - Auštrevičius.

Voting session, including a draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament, and Ambient air quality Directive

MEPs discuss a draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament for the upcoming mandate. opening statements by Sandro GOZI (Renew, FR) and Loránt VINCZE (EPP, RO), Rapporteurs and by Pascual NAVARRO RÍOS, Spanish Secretary of State for the EU.

Draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament: closing statements by Pascual NAVARRO RÍOS, Spanish Secretary of State for the European Union on behalf of the Spanish Presidency of the European Council, Sandro

MEPs discuss a draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament for the upcoming mandate.

Draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament: one round of political group speakers

MEPs discuss a draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the European Parliament for the upcoming mandate. Opening statements by Sandro GOZI (Renew, FR) and Loránt VINCZE (EPP, RO), Rapporteurs and by Pascual NAVARRO RÍOS, Spanish Secretary of State for the EUThis transcription is a result of an automatic process. Please check agaisnt delivery.

Draft European Council decision establishing the composition of the EP: opening statements by Sandro GOZI (Renew, FR) and Loránt VINCZE (EPP, RO), Rapporteurs and by Pascual NAVARRO RÍOS, Spanish Secretary of State for the EU

MEPs debate with the Commission and the Concil The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession for Romania and Bulgaria. Closing statements by Vladimir BALAŠ, Czech Minister of Education, Youth and Sport and by Ylva JOHANSSON, European Commissioner for Home Affairs.

The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession: closing statements by Vladimir BALAŠ, Czech Minister of Education, Youth and Sport and by Ylva JOHANSSON, European Commissioner for Home Affairs

MEPs debate the decision by the Council to not extend the travel-free Schengen area to Romania and Bulgaria. Extracts from the debate in plenary.

The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession: extracts from the debate

MEPs debate with the Commission and the Concil The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession for Romania and Bulgaria.

The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession: MEPs debate

MEPs debate with the Commission and the Concil The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession for Romania and Bulgaria. Opening statements by Vladimir BALAŠ, Czech Minister of Education, Youth and Sport, for the Council and by Ylva JOHANSSON, European Commissioner for Home Affairs.

The recent JHA Council decision on Schengen accession: opening statements by Vladimir BALAŠ , Czech Minister of Education, Youth and Sport, for the Council and by Ylva JOHANSSON, European Commissioner for Home Affairs

Plenary back Croatia’s Schengen accession. MEPs agree that the country already fulfils the necessary conditions to join the free-travel zone, and the Council must now take a unanimous decision to lift the remaining border controls between the Schengen area and Croatia. Extracts from the debate in the plenary.

Council decision on Schengen acquis in Croatia: extracts from the debate and the vote

Draft Council Decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Croatia closing statements. Closing statements by Margaritis SCHINAS, Vice-President of the European Commission in charge of promoting our European Way of Life and by Paulo RANGEL (EPP, PT).

Draft Council Decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Croatia: closing statements by Margaritis SCHINAS, Vice-President of the European Commission

MEPs debate on the Draft Council Decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Croatia.

Draft Council Decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Croatia: MEPs debate

Opening statements by Paulo RANGEL (EPP, PT), Rapporteur and by Margaritis SCHINAS, Vice-President of the European Commission in charge of promoting our European Way of Life on the draft Council Decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Croatia.

Draft Council Decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Croatia: opening statements by Paulo RANGEL (EPP, PT), Rapporteur and by Margaritis SCHINAS, Vice-President of the European Commission

Roberta METSOLA, EP President, opens the plenary session on the 3 October in Strasbourg. Statement on Nicaragua’s decision to expel the Dutch ambassador and on the anniversary of the 9th anniversary of migrant shipwreck at Lampedusa (October 2013).

Opening statement by Roberta METSOLA, EP President on Nicaragua’s decision to expel the Dutch ambassador and on the 9th anniversary of migrant shipwreck at Lampedusa (October 2013)

Ste se kdaj vprašali, kako se sprejemajo odločitve v EU? Pred vami je 20-minutna predstavitev.

Postopek odločanja v EU

MEPs vote on the following topics: The arrest of Cardinal Zen and the trustees of the 612 relief fund in Hong Kong; The situation of indigenous and environmental defenders in Brazil, including the killing of Dom Philips and Bruno Pereira; The situation in Tajikistan’s Gorno-Badakhshan Autonomous Province; Sustainable aviation fuels (ReFuelEU Aviation Initiative) - Søren GADE (Renew, DK); Financial Activities of the European Investment Bank - annual report 2021 - David CORMAND; Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank - annual report 2020; Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - combating fraud - annual report 2020; Better regulation: Joining forces to make better laws; US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights in the United States and the need to safeguard abortion rights and Women’s health in the EU.

Voting session, including US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights in the United States and the need to safeguard abortion rights and Women’s health in the EU

Following the US Supreme Court’s vote to overturn guaranteed nationwide protection of abortion rights on 24 June, MEPs reaffirm their support for both the provision of and advocacy for the right and access to legal and safe abortion care. Closing statement by Helena DALLI, European Commissioner for Equality.

US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights and the need to safeguard abortion rights and Women’s health including in the EU: closing statement by Helena DALLI, European Commissioner for Equality

2.255 rezultatov

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention