EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Need for an urgent Council Decision in favour of amending the protection status of wolves in the Bern Convention

Besluit inzake staatssteun met betrekking tot Apple (debat)

Apple state-aid decision (debate)

De bevoegdheid, het toepasselijke recht, de erkenning en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen op het gebied van huwelijksvermogensstelsels - De bevoegdheid, het toepasselijke recht, de erkenning en de tenuitvoerlegging van beslissingen op het gebied van de vermogensrechtelijke gevolgen van geregistreerde partnerschappen (debat)

Jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of matrimonial property regimes - Jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships (debate)

Het besluit van Japan om in het seizoen 2015-2016 de walvisvangst te hervatten (debat)

Japan's decision to resume whaling in the 2015-2016 season (debate)

Besluit van de Grote Nationale Vergadering van Turkije om de parlementaire immuniteit van 138 leden op te heffen (debat)

Decision of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey to lift the parliamentary immunity of 138 members (debate)

Aangenomen besluit over de agenda voor nieuwe vaardigheden voor Europa (debat)

Decision adopted on New Skills agenda for Europe (debate)

Aangenomen besluit over het maatregelenpakket voor de digitale interne markt (voortzetting van het debat)

Decision adopted on the Digital Single Market package (continuation of debate)

Aangenomen besluit over het maatregelenpakket voor de digitale interne markt (debat)

Decision adopted on the Digital Single Market package (debate)

Aangenomen besluit inzake de hervorming van het gemeenschappelijk Europees asielstelsel (debat)

Decision adopted on the Common European Asylum System reform (debate)

Besluit over fiscale transparantie (debat)

Decision adopted on public tax transparency (debate)

Door de Commissie vastgesteld besluit inzake het pakket voor het Europees semester, inclusief landenverslagen - Europees semester voor coördinatie van het economisch beleid: jaarlijkse groeianalyse 2016 - Governance van de interne markt binnen het Europees semester 2016 - Europees semester voor coördinatie van het economisch beleid: sociale en werkgelegenheidsaspecten in de jaarlijkse groeianalyse 2016 (debat)

Commission decision adopted on the European Semester package, including country reports - European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2016 - Single Market governance within the European Semester 2016 - European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social aspects in the Annual Growth Survey 2016 (debate)

Door de Commissie vastgesteld besluit betreffende het pakket voor de vennootschapsbelasting (debat)

Commission decision adopted on the Corporate Tax package (debate)

Aangenomen besluit inzake de Europese toegankelijkheidswet (debat)

Decision adopted on the European Accessibility Act (debate)

Aangenomen besluit over het pakket inzake een Europese grens- en kustwacht (debat)

Decision adopted on the European border and coast guard package (debate)

Besluit over het pakket inzake de circulaire economie (debat)

Decision adopted on the Circular Economy package (debate)

Aangenomen besluit over het pakket "Europees semester" - jaarlijkse groeianalyse 2016 (debat)

Decision adopted on the European Semester package - Annual Growth Survey 2016 (debate)

Gevolgen van de uitspraak van het HvJ waardoor het veiligehavenbesluit van de VS ongeldig wordt verklaard (debat)

Consequences of the ECJ ruling invalidating the US Safe Harbour decision (debate)

Genomen besluit over het pakket inzake de kapitaalmarktenunie (debat)

Decision adopted on the Capital Markets Union package (debate)

Besluit van 15 juli 2015 over het zomerpakket inzake de energie-unie (debat)

Decision adopted on 15 July 2015 on the energy summer package (debate)

EP Plenary session - The breach of Council Decision 2017/2074 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela - illegal entry on the territory of an EU Member State of a person included in the list of sanctions

EP Plenary session - Automated decision - making process: Ensuring consumer protection, and free movement of goods and services

EPRS - ' What is our political nature? Knowledge and reason in political decision-making '

IMCO committee meeting. Vote on the automated decision-making processes; Ensuring consumer protection, and free movement of goods and services ; Petra DE SUTTER report

EP Plenary session - Statement by David SASSOLI, EP President on Decision of the Court of Justice on the Oriol JUNQUERAS case

Lex signing ceremony by David SASSOLI, EP President and Tytti TUPPURAINEN, Finnish Minister for European Affairs on the decision appointing the European Chief Prosecutor of the European Public Prosecutor's Office

European Parliament Press Seminar. European elections. Choose your Future- Main Decisions of the European Parliament the 2014-2019 term- European Elections: Parliament facilities

Polish and European flags lowered to half-mast following the death of the Mayor of Gdansk, Pawel Adamowicz, in solidarity with the victim and the Polish people and their authorities’ decision to declare a period of national mourning

Press conference by Pierre MOSCOVICI, European Commissioner, on “Read-out of the College meeting and a more democratic and effective decision-making process on EU taxation policy

LIBE committee meeting - Votes on General budget of the European Union for the financial year 201,9 - on Implementing decision on subjecting the new psychoactive substances and on Listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Kosovo).

Plenary session - Commission decision adopted on the third Mobility Package - Commission statement

Plenary session - Week 18 in Brussels - Commission decision adopted on the MFF post-2020 package

Plenary session - Week 18  2018 in Brussels - Commission decision adopted on the MFF post-2020 packag

Plenary session - Week 18  2018 in Brussels - Commission decision adopted on the MFF post-2020 package

Plenary session - US decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminium - Opening statement by Commission

Plenary session - Week 06  2018 in Strasbourg - Decision adopted on the EU Enlargement Strategy - Western Balkans

LIBE Committee meeting - Vote on the Commission decision to activate Article 7 paragraph 1 TEU as regards the situation in Poland. Statement by Claude MORAES - rapporteur

Following the US Supreme Court’s vote to overturn guaranteed nationwide protection of abortion rights on 24 June, MEPs reaffirm their support for both the provision of and advocacy for the right and access to legal and safe abortion care.

US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights and the need to safeguard abortion rights and Women’s health including in the EU: MEPs debate

Following the US Supreme Court’s vote to overturn guaranteed nationwide protection of abortion rights on 24 June, MEPs reaffirm their support for both the provision of and advocacy for the right and access to legal and safe abortion care. Extracts from the debate.

US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights in the United States and the need to safeguard abortion rights and Women’s health including in the EU: extracts from the debate

Following the US Supreme Court’s vote to overturn guaranteed nationwide protection of abortion rights on 24 June, MEPs reaffirm their support for both the provision of and advocacy for the right and access to legal and safe abortion care. Opening statement by Helena DALLI, European Commissioner for Equality.

US Supreme Court decision to overturn abortion rights in the US and the need to safeguard abortion rights and Women’s health including in the EU: opening statement by Helena DALLI, European Commissioner for Equality

Burgers uit heel Europa laten van zich horen en delen hun ideeën om van de EU een betere plek te maken. Maar hoe werkt de Conferentie precies? En wat betekent zij voor jou en je omgeving? 

De Conferentie over de toekomst van Europa is een ambitieus project om ervoor te zorgen dat de belangrijkste besluitvormers van Europa de ideeën van alle Europeanen te horen krijgen en deze in overweging nemen. Tot nu toe hebben meer dan 450 000 mensen hun ideeën gedeeld via de Conferentie. 

Ontdek hoe zij de toekomst van Europa beïnvloeden door hun stem te laten horen, wie ze ook zijn of waar ze ook wonen, en door deel te nemen aan deze opwindende nieuwe stap in de Europese democratie.

De Conferentie over de toekomst van Europa: beleef democratie in actie

The Committee on Foreign Interference has prepared a series of recommendations aimed to beef up the EU’s capabilities on foreign interference, including a sanctions regime to fight foreign meddling and disinformation, general information campaigns spreading awareness about its dangers, and tightened rules for social media platforms serving as vehicles for foreign interference. The recent invasion of Ukraine by Russia and the use of desinformation by the Kremlin, as well as the recent EU's decisions to ban Sputknik and Russia Today are also at the center of the debate.

Foreign interference in all democratic processes in the EU: extracts from the debate and results of the vote

Roberta Metsola, EP President, has decided, in coordination with the decision of the European Commission, to either fly the Ukraine flag or other visual signs of support for the Ukraine people. Views of the buildings of the EP in Brussels with the Ukrainian flags.

Ukraine flags in front of the European Parliament buildings in Brussels: exterior views

MEPs assess the EU Court’s decision on the request to annul the regulation that links disbursement of EU funds with respect for the rule of law. The budget conditionality regulation aims to protect EU funds from being misused by national governments that breach the rule of law. It entered into force on 1 January 2021. On 11 March 2021, Poland and Hungary challenged the regulation in the EU Court of Justice. Second part of the debate.

The Rule of Law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling: MEPs debate (Part 2/3)

MEPs assess the EU Court’s decision on the request to annul the regulation that links disbursement of EU funds with respect for the rule of law. The budget conditionality regulation aims to protect EU funds from being misused by national governments that breach the rule of law. It entered into force on 1 January 2021. On 11 March 2021, Poland and Hungary challenged the regulation in the EU Court of Justice. Opening statements by Clément BEAUNE, French Minister of State for European Affairs and by Johannes HAHN, European Commissioner for Budget and Administration. This transcription is a result of an automatic process. Please check against delivery.

The Rule of Law and the consequences of the European Court of Justice ruling: opening statements by Clément BEAUNE, French Minister of State for European Affairs and by Johannes HAHN, European Commissioner for Budget and Administration

MEPs Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) , Chair of CONT (Budgetary Control) Committee and Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR (S&D, ES), Chair of LIBE (Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs) Committee assess the EU Court of Justice’s decision on the request to annul the regulation that links disbursement of EU funds with respect for the rule of law. The budget conditionality regulation aims to protect EU funds from being misused by national governments that breach the rule of law.

The Rule of Law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling: statements by Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) , Chair of CONT Committee and Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR (S&D, ES), Chair of LIBE Committee

MEPs assess the EU Court’s decision on the request to annul the regulation that links disbursement of EU funds with respect for the rule of law. The budget conditionality regulation aims to protect EU funds from being misused by national governments that breach the rule of law. It entered into force on 1 January 2021. On 11 March 2021, Poland and Hungary challenged the regulation in the EU Court of Justice. First part of the debate.

The Rule of Law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling: MEPs debate (Part 1/3)

MEPs quiz the Commission and the Council on the proposal to adapt EU asylum rules in Poland, Latvia and Lithuania to deal with migrants coming from Belarus. Closing statements by Margaritis SCHINAS, Vice-President of the European Commission and by Anže LOGAR, Slovenian Minister of Foreign Affairs.

The proposed Council decision on provisional emergency measures for the external border with Belarus: closing statements by Margaritis SCHINAS, Vice-President of the European Commission and by Anže LOGAR, Slovenian Minister of Foreign Affairs

MEPs quiz the Commission and the Council on the proposal to adapt EU asylum rules in Poland, Latvia and Lithuania to deal with migrants coming from Belarus.

The proposed Council decision on provisional emergency measures for the external border with Belarus: MEPs debate

MEPs quiz the Commission and the Council on the proposal to adapt EU asylum rules in Poland, Latvia and Lithuania to deal with migrants coming from Belarus. Opening statements by Anže LOGAR, Slovenian Minister of Foreign Affairs and by Margaritis SCHINAS, Vice-President of the European Commission in charge of promoting our European Way of Life.

The proposed Council decision on provisional emergency measures for the external border with Belarus: opening statements by Anže LOGAR, Slovenian Minister of Foreign Affairs and by Margaritis SCHINAS, Vice-President of the European Commission

MEPs debate the Commission and the Council on the proposal to adapt EU asylum rules in Poland, Latvia and Lithuania to deal with migrants coming from Belarus.

The proposed Council decision on provisional emergency measures for the external border with Belarus: extracts from the debate

Het Europees Parlement en de European Film Academy hebben de drie genomineerde films voor de LUX-publieksprijs 2022 bekendgemaakt. ‘Flee’ van Jonas Poher Rasmussen, ‘Great Freedom’ van Sebastian Meise en ‘Quo Vadis, Aida?’ by Jasmila Žbanić komen in aanmerking voor de prijs. Bekijk de films en stem om de winnaar te helpen kiezen!

Geheimen en onmogelijke beslissingen in de LUX-publieksprijs 2022

Statement by Sergey LAGODINSKY (Greens/EFA, DE), Chair of the EP-Turkey delegation following the announcement that ten ambassadors have been expelled from Turkey. It happens after that representatives from the US, Canada, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, and New Zealand issued a joint statement earlier this week demanding the urgent release of osman Kavala a prominent businessman and philanthropist who has been held in pre-trial detention for more than four years on charges related to the 2013 Gezi park protests and the 2016 coup attempt.

Statement by Sergey LAGODINSKY (Greens/EFA, DE), Chair of the EP-Turkey delegation, on the decision of Turkish President to expel western ambassadors after the support to Osman Kavala

The Conference of Presidents meet in Strasbourg. The winner of the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of thought is decided by Parliament’s President and political group leaders. Awarded for the first time in 1988, the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought is the highest tribute paid by the European Union to human rights work. It gives recognition to individuals, groups and organisations that have made an outstanding contribution to protecting freedom of thought. 2021 Sakharov Prize:Alexei Navalny, nominated for his courage in fighting for freedom, democracy and human rights, is a Russian opposition politician, anti-corruption activist and major political opponent of the country's president Vladimir Putin.

Meeting of the EP Conference of Presidents on the decision on laureate of the 2021 Sakharov Prize : arrivals, roundtable and announcement of the result in the Plenary session

Exchange of views at the EP Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) in association with the Delegation for Northern cooperation and for relations with Switzerland on the decision of the Swiss Federal Council to terminate the negotiations of the EU-Swiss Institutional Framework Agreement: statement by Urmas PAET (Renew, EE), Vice-Chair of the AFET Committee who reminded that Switzerland is the fourth important trade partner for the EU including around 120 different agreements. Andreas SCHWAB (EPP, DE), Chair of the EP Delegation for Switzerland, stressed (remotely) that it is in the mutual interest of both sides to stabilise and further develop European-Swiss cooperation and a multi programming agreement is needed. Michael KARNITSCHNIG, director of external relations at the Secretariat General of the European Commission, mentionned (remotely) that the issue of a level playing field is fundamental.

Exchange of views on the decision of the Swiss Federal Council to terminate the negotiations of the EU-Swiss Institutional Framework Agreement: statement by Urmas PAET (Renew, EE), Vice-Chair of the AFET Committee

2.255 resultaten

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Council decision inviting Member States to ratify the Violence and Harassment Convention

EP Plenary session - Need for an urgent Council Decision in favour of amending the protection status of wolves in the Bern Convention